Why the study?
Clinical management of patients with CIED undergoing radiotherapy is inconsistent due to the lack of consistent guidelines from manufacturers and physician specialty societies.
What is the current clinical practice and guideline-based management for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing radiotherapy?
What is the current clinical practice and guideline-based management for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing radiotherapy?
This review synthesizes recent guidelines to provide a simplified management guide for patients with CIEDs undergoing radiotherapy, highlighting risks like device interference and permanent damage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform CIED radiotherapy risk assessment via dose and neutron factors; leaves open prospective validation of the simplified guide.
Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) undergoing radiotherapy (RT) are more common due to the ageing of the population. With newer CIEDs' implementing the complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology which allows the miniaturization of CIED, it is also more susceptible to RT. Effects of RT on CIED ranges from device interference, device operational/memory errors of permanent damage. These malfunctions can cause life-threatening clinical effects. Cumulative dose is not the only component of RT that causes CIED malfunction, as neutron use and dose rate effect also affects CIEDs. The management of this patient cohort in clinical practice is inconsistent due to the lack of a consistent guideline from manufacturers and physician specialty societies. Our review will focus on the current clinical practice and the recently updated guidelines of managing patients with CIED undergoing RT. We aim to simplify the evidence and provide a simple and easy to use guide based on the recent guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azraai et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: