Why the study?
Does single-dose moxifloxacin increase proarrhythmic surrogate markers in healthy Filipino subjects?
Does single-dose moxifloxacin increase proarrhythmic surrogate markers in healthy Filipino subjects?
Moxifloxacin significantly prolongs QTcF and alters other repolarization markers in healthy subjects, validating exposure-response modeling as a reliable tool for estimating the proarrhythmic potential of new drugs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Establishes moxifloxacin as valid positive control in Filipino subjects; confirms exposure-response modeling for proarrhythmic risk assessment.
Effects of moxifloxacin on QTc as well as proarrhythmic surrogate markers including J-Tpeakc, Tpeak-Tend and short-term variability (STV) of repolarization were examined by using both standard E14 time-based evaluation and exposure-response modeling. The study was conducted with a single-blind, randomized, single-dose, placebo-controlled and two-period cross-over design in healthy Filipino subjects. QT interval was corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF). In the E14 time-based evaluation of ECG data, the largest ΔΔQTcF with 90% confidence interval was 14.1 ms (11.2–16.9) with Cmax of 3.39 μg/mL at 3 h post-dose (n = 69; male: 35, female: 34), indicating a positive effect on the QTcF. Moxifloxacin significantly increased the ΔΔJ-Tpeakc and ΔΔTpeak-Tend, whereas the ΔΔSTV was not altered. Meanwhile in the exposure-response modeling of the same ECG data, the slope of moxifloxacin plasma concentration-ΔΔQTcF relationship was 4.84 ms per μg/mL and the predicted ΔΔQTcF with 90% confidence interval was 13.8 ms (13.1–15.1) at Cmax, also indicating a positive effect on the QTcF. Importantly, results in each proarrhythmic surrogate marker obtained by the exposure-response modeling also showed high similarity to those obtained by the E14 statistical evaluation. Thus, these results of moxifloxacin may become a guide to estimate proarrhythmic potential of new chemical entities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsukura et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: