Why the study?
Multiple valvular heart disease is common in aortic stenosis, but the evolution and prognostic impact of concomitant mitral or tricuspid disease after TAVI required evaluation.
Does the improvement of concomitant valve disease after TAVI improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis and multiple valvular heart disease?
Does the improvement of concomitant valve disease after TAVI improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis and multiple valvular heart disease?
Improvement of concomitant mitral or tricuspid valve disease occurs in roughly half of patients undergoing TAVI and is associated with a significantly lower risk of long-term mortality and cardiovascular hospitalization.
Post-TAVI improvement in concomitant lesions was associated with lower events; leaves open whether serial imaging or interventions alter prognosis in M-VHD.
BACKGROUND: Multiple valvular heart disease (M-VHD) is a common condition, often involving aortic stenosis (AS) plus a mitral or tricuspid valve disease. We aim to evaluate the evolution and prognostic impact of M-VHD in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent TAVI in a tertiary care center between January 2016 and December 2022. Echocardiography was performed before and after TAVI. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients (88 women; mean [SD] age, 80.8 [7.8] years) with severe AS and M-VHD were identified. Seventy-two (45.3%) had mitral regurgitation, 69 (43.4%) had tricuspid regurgitation, and 18 (11.3%) had mitral stenosis. After TAVI, 77 patients (48.4%) experienced an improvement of the concomitant valve disease, while 82 did not. Female gender (OR:0.25, 95%CI:0.11-0.56, P<0.001), pacemaker implantation (OR:0.37, 95%CI:0.14-0.98, P=0.046) and rheumatic etiology (OR:0.25, 95%CI:0.09-0.74, P=0.012) were negatively associated with improvement. At a median follow-up of 31 months (26-51), patients with no improvement had an increased occurrence of the composite endpoint compared to their counterparties, (P=0.028). On multivariable analysis, NYHA class III/IV (HR:2.04, 95%CI:1.02-4.08, P=0.044) and creatinine (HR:1.43, 95%CI:1.06-1.94, P=0.019) were associated with a higher risk of the endpoint, while the improvement of concomitant valve disease emerged as protective factor (HR:0.46, 95%CI:0.25-0.85, P=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant valve disease improved in roughly half of M-VHD patients after TAVI. Patients with post-TAVI improvement of the second valve lesion had better clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malara et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: