Key result
Longer HF duration is linked to a ~102% increase in 180-day mortality.
Why the study?
It was unclear how patients hospitalized for acute HF who are long-term chronic HF survivors differ from those with more recent HF diagnoses.
Does longer duration of heart failure diagnosis worsen early dyspnea relief and 180-day mortality in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure compared to recently diagnosed heart failure?
Population
5,741 hospitalized acute HF patients with documentation of HF duration from the ASCEND-HF trial
Comparison
HF duration 0 to 1 month vs >1 to 12 months vs >12 to 60 months vs >60 months
Design
Post-hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled trial
Follow-up
180-day
Authors
Loading...
Recent HF diagnosis was associated with better dyspnea relief and survival; leaves open whether chronicity should stratify acute HF trials or risk models.
RCT (n=5,741)
placebo-controlled
randomized
Does longer duration of heart failure diagnosis worsen early dyspnea relief and 180-day mortality in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure compared to recently diagnosed heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 2.02 (95% CI 1.47–2.77)
Patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with a recent diagnosis (≤1 month) have better early dyspnea relief and post-discharge survival compared to those with chronic heart failure.
Greene et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Acute heart failure (n=5,741). Longer duration of heart failure diagnosis (>60 months) vs. Recently diagnosed heart failure (≤1 month) was evaluated on 180-day mortality (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.47-2.77). Longer duration of heart failure diagnosis (>60 months vs ≤1 month) was associated with increased 180-day mortality (HR 2.02; 95% CI 1.47-2.77).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: