Why the study?
Does intrapericardial fibrinolysis with streptokinase prevent effusion reaccumulation and constriction in patients with purulent pericarditis?
Does intrapericardial fibrinolysis with streptokinase prevent effusion reaccumulation and constriction in patients with purulent pericarditis?
Early pericardial drainage combined with intrapericardial streptokinase appears safe and effective for preventing effusion reaccumulation and constriction in purulent pericarditis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support intrapericardial streptokinase after drainage in purulent pericarditis; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: Purulent pericarditis is a rare disease that is being conventionally managed with intravenous antibiotics and pericardial drainage. In our study, we used intrapericardial fibrinolytic treatment together with pericardiocentesis and antibiotic therapy. We evaluated the role of intrapericardial fibrinolytic treatment in nine purulent pericarditis patients. METHODS: Six children and three adult patients with purulent pericarditis, aged between 5 and 50 years, were treated with intrapericardial fibrinolysis by streptokinase. Intrapericardial drainage catheter was placed into the subxyphoidal localization under local anaesthesia and echocardiography guidance, streptokinase was infused into the pericardial sac as the fibrinolytic agent. RESULTS: Repeat echocardiograms showed no reaccumulation of pericardial effusions, pericardial thickening or constrictions. No patients had systemic bleeding, arrhythmias, or hypotension. There was one death which was due to sepsis and congestive heart failure. CONCLUSION: We believe that early pericardial drainage and intrapericardial fibrinolysis appears to be safe and effective in the treatment of purulent pericarditis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haşim Üstünsoy (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: