The velocity of intracellular Ca2+ waves in bovine aortic endothelial cells depends on the activation state of the IP3 receptor rather than the amplitude of the Ca2+ response.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Animal data on endothelial Ca2+ waves warrant no clinical change; leaves open IP3R velocity as a human therapeutic target.
Ca(2+) is a highly versatile second messenger that plays a key role in the regulation of many cell processes. This versatility resides in the fact that different signals can be encoded spatio-temporally by varying the frequency and amplitude of the Ca(2+) response. A typical example of an organized Ca(2+) signal is a Ca(2+) wave initiated in a given area of a cell that propagates throughout the entire cell or within a specific subcellular region. In non-excitable cells, the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP(3) R) is responsible for the release of Ca(2+) from the endoplasmic reticulum. IP(3) R activity can be directly modulated in many ways, including by interacting molecules, proteins, and kinases such as PKA, PKC, and mTOR. In the present study, we used a videomicroscopic approach to measure the velocity of Ca(2+) waves in bovine aortic endothelial cells under various conditions that affect IP(3) R function. The velocity of the Ca(2+) waves increased with the intensity of the stimulus while extracellular Ca(2+) had no significant impact on wave velocity. Forskolin increased the velocity of IP(3) R-dependent Ca(2+) waves whereas PMA and rapamycin decreased the velocity. We used scatter plots and Pearson's correlation test to visualize and quantify the relationship between the Ca(2+) peak amplitude and the velocity of Ca(2+) waves. The velocity of IP(3) R-dependent Ca(2+) waves poorly correlated with the amplitude of the Ca(2+) response elicited by agonists in all the conditions evaluated, indicating that the velocity depended on the activation state of IP(3) R, which can be modulated in many ways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Béliveau et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: