Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine against Haemophilus influenzae type b consisting of purified polyribosylribitolphosphate conjugated to tetanus toxoid (PRP-T) was evaluated in 278 Chilean infants who were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group A, PRP-T mixed with diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-pertussis (DTP) vaccine in a single syringe and given as a single inoculation in one arm and placebo in the other arm; Group B, PRP-T given in one arm and DTP in the other arm; Group C, DTP given in one arm and placebo in the other. Infants were immunized at 2, 4 and 6 months of age and examined daily for 4 days after each immunization; serum PRP antibodies were measured at baseline and 2 months after each dose. The only adverse systemic reaction attributable to PRP-T beyond that caused by DTP alone was a 7 to 20% increase in febrile responses in the first 24 hours after the first and second doses of vaccine; the fevers were largely low grade and not accompanied by increased irritability, diminished activity or loss of appetite, compared with the group who received DTP without PRP-T. After the first dose 72% of infants who received PRP-T combined with DTP and 67% who received it in a separate arm attained antibody concentrations ≥0.15 μg/ml. After two doses of PRP-T, 93 and 95%, respectively, had concentrations ≥0.15 μg/ml and after three doses 100% of infants who received PRP-T had such titers. The anti-PRP geometric mean titer (4.80 μg/ml) in infants who received PRP-T combined with DTP, while high, was significantly lower than the group who received PRP-T in a separate arm (11.32 μg/ml). After the third dose the proportion of infants who achieved high anti-PRP concentrations (≥1.0 μg/ml) was 89% in those who received PRP-T combined with DTP and 98% in those who received PRP-T in a separate arm (P < 0.05). The results of these studies are sufficiently encouraging to support further evaluation of the coad-ministration of PRP-T and DTP in a single inoculation, in view of the practical advantages of such combined immunization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferreccio et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: