Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cardiopulmonary bypass over 24-hours using heparin surface coated equipment, without systemic heparinization was analyzed in comparison to standard equipment with systemic heparinization in 8 open-chest canine experiments (37 +/- 7 kg). Mean duration of perfusion was 21 +/- 2 hours for the group perfused without versus 21 +/- 6 hours with systemic heparinization. The group without systemic heparinization could be perfused for 13 +/- 1 hours without transfusion of blood components whereas the pumpsucker was necessary during the whole procedure with systemic heparinization. Hematocrit dropped with systemic heparinization from 40 +/- 7% to 18 +/- 5% at 12 h versus a decrease from 38 +/- 4% to 15 +/- 1% without (with versus without: ns). Free plasma hemoglobin increased with systemic heparinization from 0.1 +/- 0.0 g/l to 1.4 +/- 1.2 g/l at 12 h compared with an increase 0.1 +/- 0.0 g/l to 0.3 +/- 0.1 g/l without (with versus without: p less than 0.05). Platelet levels dropped with systemic heparinization from 100 +/- 36% to 41 +/- 17% at twelve hours versus from 100 +/- 29% to 82 +/- 14 without (with versus without: p less than 0.05). Mean aortic pressure dropped with systemic heparinization from 73 +/- 12 mmHg to 53 +/- 4 mmHg at 22 hours whereas it remained at the same level without (83 +/- 6 mmHg). Improved hemostasis during long term open-chest cardiopulmonary bypass without systemic heparinization resulted in superior hemodynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Segesser et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: