Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Over 1500 treatments of hemofiltration with on-line preparation of substitution fluid were performed in 16 patients. Two patients were treated for over 40 months. On-line preparation of the solution allowed use of bicarbonate as a buffer. 73-74 L/session were infused in pre-dilution modality, at a rate of about 370 ml/min, and the treatment length was above 4 hrs. The good quality of on-line prepared solution was confirmed by the negativity of microbiological tests and by the absence of clinical or sub-clinical reactions in patients. Urea clearance was calculated by equations considering either plasma flow or whole blood flow. Results were 196-197 ml/min and 186-183 ml/min, respectively. The latter was nearer to the value of directly measured clearance (182-173 ml/min). Kt/V urea was about 1 per session and PCR ranged between 1.3 and 1.4 g/kg/day. A high vascular stability was also observed. Since sodium balance may, at least in part, account for better vascular stability, sodium sieving coefficient was measured during the treatment. The sodium-retaining effect of the increase of protein concentration within the filter, due to the ultrafiltration, was less relevant in pre-dilution hemofiltration if compared to post-dilution hemofiltration. It has been calculated that to obtain a sodium balance similar to that of the hemodialysis (HD), the sodium concentration of infusion solution should be about 2 mEq/L higher than HD dialysis solution. However, difficulty in performing accurate balance studies prevents a general agreement on these conclusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: