Why the study?
Pulmonary congestion detected by LUS is a prognostic marker in AHF, but the prognostic significance of predischarge residual B-lines required systematic evaluation.
Does the presence of residual pulmonary congestion defined by B-lines on lung ultrasound before discharge predict adverse outcomes in hospitalized acute heart failure patients?
Does the presence of residual pulmonary congestion defined by B-lines on lung ultrasound before discharge predict adverse outcomes in hospitalized acute heart failure patients?
Residual pulmonary congestion assessed by lung ultrasound B-lines at discharge is a strong independent predictor of mortality and heart failure rehospitalization in acute heart failure patients.
Residual B-lines may aid discharge risk stratification in AHF; leaves open whether LUS-guided decongestion improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary congestion detected by lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a valuable prognostic marker in acute heart failure (AHF). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of residual B-lines identified by LUS before hospital discharge. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted up to October 4, 2024. Studies assessing the association between residual B-lines and adverse clinical outcomes in hospitalized AHF patients were included, while studies involving ambulatory assessments were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) rehospitalization. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization individually. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. Residual B-lines were significantly associated with an increased risk of composite outcomes (HR: 2.32; 95 % CI: 1.91-2.82), all-cause mortality (HR: 3.01; 95 % CI: 1.91-4.73), and HF readmission or cardiovascular events (HR: 4.01; 95 % CI: 2.22-7.24). Risk increased with greater B-line burden. Prognostic impact was stronger in short-term follow-up (<6 months; HR: 3.57) than in longer-term follow-up (≥6 months; HR: 1.96). CONCLUSIONS: Residual pulmonary congestion assessed by LUS at discharge is a strong independent predictor of adverse outcomes and may guide therapy decisions in AHF management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suhardi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: