Why the study?
To assess the accuracy of global longitudinal strain using speckle tracking echocardiography in detecting resting myocardial ischaemia and its severity compared with visual assessment of wall motion score index by conventional 2D echocardiography.
Does global longitudinal strain (GLS) using STE improve the prediction of severity and extent of coronary artery stenosis compared to wall motion score index in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does global longitudinal strain (GLS) using STE improve the prediction of severity and extent of coronary artery stenosis compared to wall motion score index in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Global longitudinal strain using speckle tracking echocardiography provides high sensitivity and specificity for predicting significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome, outperforming conventional wall motion score index.
Supports the diagnostic utility of global longitudinal strain for resting ischaemia; leaves open whether routine use improves.
Background 2 D Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is a non-invasive, angle-independent, semiautomatic and objective technique that quantitatively assesses global and regional longitudinal systolic strain and provides a single bull’s eye map for segmental wall strain of the left ventricle.Objectives assessment of the accuracy of global longitudinal strain (GLS) using STE in the detection of resting myocardial ischaemia and its severity compared with visual assessment of wall motion score index by conventional 2 D echoPatients and methods 100 patients who presented with ACS were included. Wall motion score index (WMSI) was calculated in a 16-segment model and compared with GLS assessed in left ventricle 17 segments and calculated automatically by summation of regional longitudinal peak systolic strain (RLS) using STE. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed on clinical indication and significant stenosis was defined as a 70% reduction of the arterial lumen.Results 56 patients (56%) of patients were males with a mean age of 58.3 years. GLS showed a significant positive correlation between ejection fraction (EF) and GLS (p < 0.05), (r value 0.514) and a good significant negative correlation between WMSI and GLS (p < 0.05), (r value 0.593). And a good significant correlation between GLS and both severity of the lesion and the number of affected vessels was found (p < 0.05). ROC curves showed the cut-off point of GLS was (−15.9) for predicting lesion ≥70% with 88.1% sensitivity, 90.2% specificity respectively,Conclusion GLS has higher specificity, sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of the severity of lesion and number of the vessel affected than WMSI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mawla et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: