Why the study?
Traditional echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function might not properly reflect graft physiology due to alterations induced by heart transplant.
Traditional echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function may not properly reflect graft physiology in heart transplant patients, necessitating specialized assessment algorithms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights the unreliability of standard echocardiography for graft physiology; leaves open the need.
Heart transplant (HTx) still represents the most effective therapy for end-stage heart failure, with a median survival time of 10 years. The transplanted heart shows peculiar physiology due to the profound alterations induced by the operation, which inevitably influences several echocardiographic parameters assessed during these patients' follow-ups. With these premises, the diastolic function is one of the main aspects to take into consideration. The left atrium (LA) plays a key role in this matter, and that same chamber is significantly impaired with the transplant, with different degrees of altered function based on the surgical technique. Therefore, the traditional echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function applied to the general population might not properly reflect the physiology of the graft. This review attempts to provide current evidence on diastolic function in HTx starting from defining its different physiology and how the standard echocardiographic parameters might be affected to its prognostic role. Furthermore, based on the experience of our center and the available evidence, we proposed an algorithm that might help clinicians distinguish from actual diastolic dysfunction from a normal diastolic pattern in HTx population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sciaccaluga et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: