Key result
Pre-transplant idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy is linked to ~5% higher 1-year post-transplant LVEF versus ischaemic aetiology.
Why the study?
Does pre-transplant aetiology (idiopathic vs ischaemic) determine ventricular function in heart transplant patients at 1-year follow-up?
Cohort (n=48)
Does pre-transplant aetiology (idiopathic vs ischaemic) determine ventricular function in heart transplant patients at 1-year follow-up?
Absolute Event Rate: 67% vs 62%
Pre-transplant etiology of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy is associated with significantly better left ventricular systolic function of the cardiac allograft at 1 year compared to ischemic etiology.
LV-SF remains stable over 1 year in HTx recipients regardless of pre-transplant etiology; leaves open effects on functional capacity and long-term outcomes.
The natural history of the LV systolic function (LV-SF) and functional capacity of survivors of heart transplantation (Htx) has not been defined. Some investigators suggest that SF may be different in recipients with different pre-transplant aetiologies: ischaemic or dilated, idiopathic disease. Routine transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE) were performed during a 1-year follow-up in 48 Htx recipients (total 864 examinations; mean 18/patient). Patients were divided into two groups based on pre-transplant diagnosis: ischaemic (CAD-CMP: n=13, age 54+/-1.7 years, 23% females) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (ID-CMP: n=35, age 51+/-2.3 years, 26% females). Patients with valvular and toxic aetiology were excluded. All patients underwent left ventriculography (VENT) 12-15 months after Htx. The majority of 1-year survivors of Htx maintained normal LV-SF: mean LVEF 65+/-4% by echocardiography and 68+/-3% by ventriculography, but in the ID-CMP group LVEF was significantly higher: 67+/-4% vs. 62+/-4% (TTE) and 77+/-4% vs. 60+/-4% (VENT), without significant differences in functional capacity (NYHA). 82.9% of ID-CMP patients had LVEF >65% vs. 39% in CAD-CMP. The incidence of acute cellular rejection, freedom from cardiac vasculopathy, renal failure, diabetes, hypertension and pre-transplant alloantibody level was similar. Our study shows a strong correlation between pre-transplant heart disease and the systolic function of the cardiac allograft at 1-year follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antunes et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Heart transplantation (n=48). Pre-transplant idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy vs. Pre-transplant ischaemic cardiomyopathy was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiography. Pre-transplant idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy was associated with a significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 year post-transplant compared to ischaemic aetiology (67% vs 62%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: