Why the study?
Knowledge gaps exist regarding the pathophysiologic link in cardiorenal interaction, prompting investigation of this relationship at a subclinical level in patients with hypertension before conventional parameters are disrupted.
Does ventriculoarterial coupling correlate better with renal augmented velocity index (Avi) than with renal resistive index (RI) in treatment-naive hypertensive patients?
Does ventriculoarterial coupling correlate better with renal augmented velocity index (Avi) than with renal resistive index (RI) in treatment-naive hypertensive patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Renal augmented velocity index (Avi) correlates significantly with ventriculoarterial coupling in treatment-naive hypertensive patients, suggesting it may be a more reliable marker of subclinical cardiorenal changes than renal resistive index.
Objective It's a well‐known scientific statement that the heart and kidney functions are frequently tied together and the impairment of one directly alters the other. However, there exist knowledge gaps about this intricate pathophysiologic link and the exact unifying mechanism is not established. Herein, we aimed to investigate the presence of cardiorenal interaction at subclinical level while the conventional cardiac and renal clinical parameters are not disrupted yet in patients with hypertension. Methods We chose a novel renal Doppler ultrasonographic parameter—augmented velocity index (Avi)—and an echocardiographic measure—ventriculoarterial coupling—which is complex to analyze but increasingly used after its acceptance about being a key determinant of cardiovascular efficiency. We recruited 137 patients without a previous history of antihypertensive medication use (47.4% women; median age, 49 years). Renal Avi, renal resistive index (RI), arterial elastance (Ea), ventricular elastance (Ees) and Ea/Ees (ventriculoarterial coupling) parameters were all examined. Results Renal Avi, Ea, and Ea/Ees values were higher in females. Correlation analysis revealed that renal Avi was correlated with many hemodynamic variables including Ea and Ea/Ees. On multiple linear regression analysis, Ea and Ea/Ees remained as significant independent predictors of renal Avi but not of renal RI after adjustments for co‐variables (β = 0.488, P < .001 for Ea; β = 0.380, P < .001 for Ea/Ees). Conclusions In comparison to renal RI, we suggest that renal Avi is a more reliable and promising index that can even measure subclinical changes in the cardiorenal circulation which needs to be elucidated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karasu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: