Why the study?
Does intracoronary or intravenous thrombolysis improve outcomes in Kawasaki disease patients with coronary aneurysm thrombosis?
Does intracoronary or intravenous thrombolysis improve outcomes in Kawasaki disease patients with coronary aneurysm thrombosis?
In children with Kawasaki disease and coronary aneurysm thrombosis, thrombolytic therapy is effective and safe, with ICT suited for small/early thrombi and IVCT for giant thrombi.
May guide thrombolysis selection by thrombus size in Kawasaki disease; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic therapy for coronary aneurysm thrombosis of Kawasaki disease (KD) includes antiplatelet and anticoagulants, i.v. coronary thrombolysis (IVCT), and i.c. thrombolysis (ICT). Therapeutic methods, drugs and doses vary among medical facilities. METHODS AND RESULTS: A nationwide survey of thrombolytic therapy was conducted under the auspices of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Research Program to Intractable Diseases Research Grants. A secondary survey targeted 14 facilities conducting thrombolytic therapy during a 5 year period (2004-2009). The primary survey investigated performance of thrombolytic therapy for 23 KD patients at 14 facilities, and of these, five with acute myocardial infarction had received ICT and combined therapy. The secondary survey investigated the pre-treatment condition of aneurysm and thrombosis and actual treatment methods. ICT was effective for small thrombi (≤ 10 mm), while IVCT was effective even for giant thrombi (>10 mm). ICT was also effective for thrombi within several hours after formation. CONCLUSION: In the present nationwide survey, thrombolytic therapy was more effective in cases of a shorter duration between thrombus formation and the start of treatment. It was found that many facilities used only IVCT for thrombus alone. Medications given to KD children did not cause serious hemorrhagic complications, unlike in adults. Although doses exceeded recommended levels in many cases, the only complications were nasal bleeding and fever.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harada et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: