Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reports of laboratory abnormalities associated with HTLV-I and HTLV-II infection are inconsistent. We assessed complete blood counts and selected serum chemistry measures at enrollment in a cohort of 153 HTLV-I-seropositive, 386 HTLV-II-seropositive, and 795 HTLV-seronegative blood donors. Linear and logistic regression were used to adjust for potential confounding variables including age, gender, race/ethnicity, education level, blood center, and injection drug use. Compared with seronegative donors, absolute lymphocyte counts were 6% and 10% higher, on average, in HTLV-I-infected (p = .03) and HTLV-II-infected (p = .0001) donors, respectively. HTLV-I- and HTLV-II-seropositive donors had, on average, 17,630 (p = .003) and 15,160 (p = .0005) more platelets, respectively. HTLV-I-infected donors also had an average of 30 fewer eosinophils/microl (p = .003) and a slightly higher level of lactic dehydrogenase (p = .05). HTLV-II-infected subjects had on average, an 11% decrease in creatine kinase (p = .006), a minor increase in mean corpuscular volume (p = .01), and a slightly lower serum calcium level (p = .0005). These results indicate that both HTLV-I and HTLV-II may raise levels of lymphocytes and platelets by unknown mechanisms. Lower eosinophil counts may be related to the increased susceptibility of HTLV-I-infected subjects to parasitic diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murphy et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: