Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical modeling reveals that regional mobilization contributions require minimum reproductive and adaptive thresholds, indicating that unconstrained resource extraction undermines national...
The article addresses the problem of defining a regional development objective under a mobilization economy, where a territory's contribution to national priorities may deplete its reproductive base. The hypothesis is that a region's mobilization contribution is economically valid only if critical functions remain continuous and a minimum adaptive reserve is preserved. Systemic, structural-functional and normative analysis demonstrates the inadequacy of single-criterion maximization of output, fiscal revenue or transferred resources. A three-component objective function of regional economic viability is developed, combining mobilization contribution, critical regional reproduction and adaptive reserve. The function is formalized as a constrained maximization problem in which achievement of a national priority is bounded by critical-function thresholds and an intertemporal condition for preserving adaptive capacity. Violation of either constraint is shown to transform a current mobilization effect into a deferred reduction of national potential. Viable, depleting and ineffective forms of regional mobilization are distinguished. The results align national goal-setting with spatial heterogeneity and provide a basis for selecting regional decisions under prolonged structural pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oleg Motorin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: