Key result
A mechanism-based diagnostic and therapeutic approach is recommended for managing patients with episodic sinus tachycardia and orthostatic intolerance, including IAST and POTS.
A mechanism-based diagnostic and therapeutic approach is recommended for the complex management of patients with episodic sinus tachycardia and orthostatic intolerance.
May guide evaluation of orthostatic intolerance syndromes; leaves open validation in prospective trials.
Patients with episodic sinus tachycardia and associated orthostatic intolerance present a diagnostic and management dilemma to the clinician. We define this group of disorders to include sinus node reentrant tachycardia (SNRT), inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IAST), and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). After a brief review of the current understanding of the pathophysiology and epidemiology of this group of disorders, we focus on the diagnosis and management of IAST and POTS. Our approach attempts to recognize the considerable overlap in pathophysiology and clinical presentation between these two heterogeneous conditions. Thus, we focus on a mechanism-based workup and therapeutic approach. Sinus tachycardia related to identifiable causes should first be ruled out in these patients. Next, a basic cardiovascular and autonomic workup is suggested to exclude structural heart disease, identify a putative diagnosis, and guide therapy. We review both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy, with a focus on recent advances. Larger randomized control trials and further mechanistic studies will help refine management in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narichania et al. (2014) conducted a review in Episodic sinus tachycardia and orthostatic intolerance (SNRT, IAST, POTS). Mechanism-based diagnostic and therapeutic approach was evaluated. A mechanism-based diagnostic and therapeutic approach is recommended for managing patients with episodic sinus tachycardia and orthostatic intolerance, including IAST and POTS.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: