Key result
CRT-D was associated with a reduced risk for cardiac death in patients with left bundle branch block (HR 0.56, P=0.029) but an increased risk for non-cardiac death in non-LBBB patients.
Why the study?
Does CRT-D compared to ICD-only affect the risk of cardiac and non-cardiac mortality in patients from the MADIT-CRT trial?
Population
1,820 patients from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization…
Comparison
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with… vs Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
4 years
Authors
Loading...
Reinforces QRS morphology for CRT-D selection; leaves open net mortality effects in non-LBBB.
RCT (n=1,820)
Yes
Does CRT-D compared to ICD-only affect the risk of cardiac and non-cardiac mortality in patients from the MADIT-CRT trial?
Hazard Ratio: 0.56
p-value: p=0.029
CRT-D reduces cardiac death in patients with LBBB but may increase non-cardiac death in those without LBBB, reinforcing the importance of QRS morphology in patient selection.
Perkiömäki et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Myocardial dysfunction (n=1,820). Cardiac resynchronization therapy with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D) vs. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy was evaluated on Cardiac death in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) (HR 0.56, p=0.029). CRT-D was associated with a reduced risk for cardiac death in patients with left bundle branch block (HR 0.56, P=0.029) but an increased risk for non-cardiac death in non-LBBB patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: