Key result
Continuous wave Doppler echocardiography mean gradients correlated significantly with catheterization gradients (r=0.88), with a gradient ≥40 mmHg showing 67% sensitivity and 95% specificity for severe aortic stenosis.
Why the study?
Does continuous wave Doppler echocardiography accurately estimate the severity of aortic stenosis compared to cardiac catheterization in elderly male patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=44)
No
Does continuous wave Doppler echocardiography accurately estimate the severity of aortic stenosis compared to cardiac catheterization in elderly male patients?
Effect estimate: r = 0.88
p-value: p=<0.01
Continuous wave Doppler echocardiography is highly specific but moderately sensitive for detecting severe aortic stenosis, with underestimation likely in patients with poor left ventricular function (low stroke volume and abnormal PEP/LVET ratio).
High specificity supports ruling in severe AS by echo; leaves open sensitivity in low-flow states.
Forty-four male patients (mean age 63.6 years) with aortic stenosis (AS) were evaluated by conventional hemodynamic methods and continuous wave (CW) Doppler echocardiography. The relationship between Doppler mean gradients and direct mean pressure gradients in all patients was significant, with an r value of 0.88. Sixteen of 17 patients with a mean Doppler gradient greater than or equal to 40 mmHg had severe AS (AVA less than or equal to 1.0 cm2). Twenty-seven patients had a Doppler gradient less than 40 mmHg, and 8 of these patients had severe AS (AVA less than or equal to 1.0 cm2). The sensitivity and specificity of a Doppler gradient greater than or equal to 40 mmHg in detecting severe AS were, therefore, 67% and 95%, respectively. Thirty-three percent (8/24) of patients with severe AS and low Doppler gradients (less than 40 mmHg) had evidence of poor left ventricular function, evidenced by a lower cardiac output, a higher heart rate and an abnormal PEP/LVET ratio compared to the other patients. Thus, the presence of a low stroke volume less than or equal to 60 ml/beat and PEP/LVET x HR greater than 26 is of value in identifying patients where the Doppler is likely to significantly underestimate the degree of aortic stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nitta et al. (1988) conducted a cross-sectional in Aortic stenosis (n=44). Continuous wave Doppler echocardiography vs. Cardiac catheterization was evaluated on Correlation between Doppler mean gradients and direct mean pressure gradients (r = 0.88, p=<0.01). Continuous wave Doppler echocardiography mean gradients correlated significantly with catheterization gradients (r=0.88), with a gradient ≥40 mmHg showing 67% sensitivity and 95% specificity for severe aortic stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: