Key result
Enabling the intrathoracic impedance fluid accumulation alert in ICDs was associated with a lower rate of heart failure hospitalizations compared to disabling the alert (7% vs 20%, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does enabling an audible alert for intrathoracic impedance fluid accumulation reduce heart failure hospitalizations in patients with ICDs?
Observational (n=532)
Does enabling an audible alert for intrathoracic impedance fluid accumulation reduce heart failure hospitalizations in patients with ICDs?
Absolute Event Rate: 7% vs 20%
p-value: p=<0.001
Enabling intrathoracic impedance alerts in ICDs significantly reduces heart failure hospitalizations and the composite of cardiac death or HF hospitalization by allowing timely therapeutic intervention.
May support enabling alerts to reduce HF hospitalizations in ICD patients; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
PURPOSE: Some implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are now able to monitor intrathoracic impedance. The aim of the study was to describe the use of such monitoring in clinical practice and to evaluate the clinical impact of the fluid accumulation alert feature of these ICDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-two heart failure (HF) patients implanted with these ICDs were followed up for 11 +/- 7 months. A clinical event (CE) was deemed to have occurred if it resulted in hospitalization or milder manifestations of HF deterioration. Three hundred sixty-two acute decreases in intrathoracic impedance (Z events) occurred in 230 patients. Of these episodes, 171 (47%) were associated with a CE within 2 weeks of the Z event. In another 71 (20%) Z events, drug therapy was adjusted despite the absence of overt signs of clinical deterioration. The rate of unexplained Z events was 0.25 per patient-year and 25 hospitalizations were not associated with Z events. The audible alert was disabled in a group of 102 patients (OFF group). HF hospitalizations occurred in 29 (7%) patients in the ON group and 20 (20%, P < 0.001) patients in the OFF group. The rate of combined cardiac death and HF hospitalization was lower in patients with Alert ON (log-rank test, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The ICD reliably detected CE and yielded low rates of unexplained and undetected events. The alert capability seemed to reduce the number of HF hospitalizations by allowing timely detection and therapeutic intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catanzariti et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=532). Intrathoracic impedance monitoring with audible alert (Alert ON) vs. Audible alert disabled (Alert OFF) was evaluated on Heart failure hospitalizations (p=<0.001). Enabling the intrathoracic impedance fluid accumulation alert in ICDs was associated with a lower rate of heart failure hospitalizations compared to disabling the alert (7% vs 20%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: