Key result
Radiofrequency catheter ablation combined with PTMC significantly improved maintenance of sinus rhythm compared to direct cardioversion following PTMC (80% vs 10%; HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.03-0.75; P=0.008).
Why the study?
Does hybrid therapy of radiofrequency catheter ablation and percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy improve maintenance of sinus rhythm compared to direct cardioversion after PTMC in patients with drug-resistant atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral stenosis?
Cohort (n=20)
Does hybrid therapy of radiofrequency catheter ablation and percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy improve maintenance of sinus rhythm compared to direct cardioversion after PTMC in patients with drug-resistant atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral stenosis?
Hazard Ratio: 0.16 (95% CI 0.03–0.75)
Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 10%
p-value: p=0.008
Hybrid therapy with RFCA and PTMC is safe and significantly improves long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm compared to direct cardioversion after PTMC in patients with drug-resistant AF and rheumatic mitral stenosis.
Supports hybrid RFCA+PTMC for sinus rhythm in rheumatic MS with AF; hypothesis-generating, needs randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with mitral stenosis (MS) is often difficult using antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), even after a percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC). Few studies have examined the efficacy and safety of simultaneously performing radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and a PTMC in patients with MS and AF. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with drug-resistant AF and rheumatic MS underwent RFCA combined with a PTMC (n = 10; persistent AF-8, long-lasting [>1 year] persistent AF-2; RFCA group) or transthoracic direct cardioversion (DC) following a PTMC (n = 10; persistent AF-7, long-lasting persistent AF-3; DC group). In all patients, the mitral valve morphology was amenable to a PTMC, and more than 2 AADs had been ineffective in maintaining sinus rhythm (SR). In the RFCA group, a segmental pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in the initial 5 patients, and an extensive PVI was performed in the remaining 5. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up period of 4.0 +/- 2.7 years, 8 patients (80%) in the RFCA group were maintained in SR, as compared to 1 (10%) in the DC group (hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.75; P = 0.008 by the log-rank test). The prevalence of the concomitant use of class I and/or class III AADs was comparable between the 2 groups (P = 0.70). No complications occurred during the procedure or follow-up period in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid therapy using RFCA and a PTMC was safe and feasible, and significantly improved the AF free survival rate compared to DC following a PTMC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Machino et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and mitral stenosis (n=20). Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) combined with PTMC vs. Transthoracic direct cardioversion (DC) following PTMC was evaluated on Maintenance of sinus rhythm (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.75, p=0.008). Radiofrequency catheter ablation combined with PTMC significantly improved maintenance of sinus rhythm compared to direct cardioversion following PTMC (80% vs 10%; HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.03-0.75; P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: