Key result
A combined procedure of AF ablation and PBMC significantly increased the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm at 1-year compared to PBMC alone (75% vs 40%; p=0.004).
Why the study?
Ablation of AF is usually not considered in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis, so researchers evaluated a combined procedure of AF ablation and percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy.
Does a combined procedure of AF ablation and PBMC improve freedom from AF/AT at 1-year in patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis compared to PBMC alone?
Cohort
Does a combined procedure of AF ablation and PBMC improve freedom from AF/AT at 1-year in patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis compared to PBMC alone?
Odds Ratio: 1.58 (95% CI 1.17–17.37)
Absolute Event Rate: 75% vs 40%
p-value: p=0.004
A combined procedure of AF ablation and PBMC significantly increases the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm at 1-year compared to PBMC alone in patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis.
INTRODUCTION: Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is usually not considered in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis (RMS). We analyzed the results of a combined procedure of AF ablation and percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy (PBMC). METHODS: We prospectively included 22 patients with severe RMS to undergo a combined PBMC + AF ablation procedure. Noninvasive mapping of the atria was also performed. A historical sample of propensity-scored matched patients who underwent PBMC alone was used as controls. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF/AT at 1-year. Multivariate analysis evaluated sinus rhythm (SR) predictors. RESULTS: Successful pulmonary vein isolation and electrocardiographic imaging-based drivers ablation was performed in 20 patients following PBMC. At 1-year, 75% of the patients in the combined group were in SR compared to 40% in the propensity-score matched group (p = 0.004). The composite of AF recurrence, need for mitral surgery and all-cause mortality was also more frequent in the control group (65% vs. 30%; p = 0.005). Catheter ablation (odds ratio [OR] 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.17-17.37]; p = 0.04) and AF type (OR 1.46; 95% CI [1.05-82.64]; p < 0.001) were the only independent predictors of SR at 1-year. Noninvasive mapping in the combined group showed that the number of simultaneous rotors (OR 2.10; 95% CI [1.41-10.2]; p = 0.04) was the only independent predictor of AF. CONCLUSION: A combined procedure of AF ablation and PBMC significantly increased the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm at 1-year. Noninvasive mapping may help to improve AF characterization and guide personalized AF treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Díez‐Delhoyo et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Rheumatic mitral stenosis and atrial fibrillation. Combined AF ablation and percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy (PBMC) vs. PBMC alone was evaluated on Freedom from AF/AT at 1-year (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.17-17.37, p=0.004). A combined procedure of AF ablation and PBMC significantly increased the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm at 1-year compared to PBMC alone (75% vs 40%; p=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: