Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 19, 2010British journal of surgery

Long-term outcomes following laparoscopically assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

EEEmma J. EshuisAmsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamJSJ. F. M. SlorsAmsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamPSPieter StokkersTufts Medical Center

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Eshuis et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8df1d1d6bbc639aa09cfbchttps://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6918
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: Development, validation and application of a new instrument1995 · 1,312 citations
  2. 2Laparoscopic-Assisted Versus Open Ileocolic Resection for Crohn??s Disease2006 · 297 citations
  3. 3Long-term wound advantages of the laparoscopic approach in rectal cancer2008 · 130 citations
  4. 4Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery2006 · 686 citations
  5. 5Laparoscopic Surgery for Crohn's Disease: A Meta-Analysis2007 · 210 citations