Why the study?
Does hemodiafiltration improve the elimination of asymmetric dimethylarginine compared to hemodialysis in ESRD patients?
Does hemodiafiltration improve the elimination of asymmetric dimethylarginine compared to hemodialysis in ESRD patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hemodiafiltration does not provide an advantage over hemodialysis in removing the cardiovascular risk marker ADMA in ESRD patients.
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that hemodiafiltration (HDF) is more efficient than hemodialysis (HD) in lowering plasma levels of the endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), which is a strong and independent predictor of overall mortality in ESRD patients. METHODS/PATIENTS: Twenty ESRD patients (11 women) were studied during both a single online HDF session and a single HD session. In each patient, ADMA, L-arginine, SDMA, beta(2)-microglobulin and urea were measured at several time points. RESULTS: Although HDF was clearly superior to HD in decreasing plasma beta(2)-microglobulin, there was no difference in the elimination characteristics of ADMA. However, HDF but not HD eliminated the nitric oxide synthase substrate L-arginine, making HD superior in increasing the L-arginine/ADMA ratio. CONCLUSION: Neither HD nor HDF sufficiently removes the putative uremic toxin ADMA. The clinical significance of HD better improving the L-arginine/ADMA ratio (parameter of NO production) as compared to HDF needs to be determined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalousová et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: