Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey reveals malpractice anxiety and litigation exposure drive defensive practice in hospital healthcare workers, suggesting a need for tailored legal education.
Background and Objectives: Rising malpractice litigation and the strengthening of patient-rights legislation have changed the way hospital staff approach informed consent and legal risk. This study aimed to (i) assess the distribution of informed-consent knowledge, malpractice anxiety, and defensive practice across professional and departmental groups; (ii) identify independent predictors of high defensive practice; and (iii) evaluate experience-related moderation of the legal-literacy–anxiety association and predictor consistency across defensive-practice severity. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 146 healthcare workers (physicians, nurses, midwives, and allied health professionals) from four departments of a tertiary academic hospital network, using a 46-item pilot-tested instrument measuring informed-consent knowledge (0–20), malpractice anxiety (0–100), and defensive-practice behaviors. Results: Physicians showed higher informed-consent knowledge than nurses (14.1 vs. 12.0 points, p < 0.001) but also higher malpractice anxiety (63.4 vs. 57.6, p = 0.015). High defensive practice was associated with a prior malpractice claim (adjusted odds ratio 3.24), surgical specialty (2.47), low consent literacy (2.21), physician role (2.10), and knowing a sued colleague (1.88). Anxiety was highest in emergency medicine; predictors also operated across ordered defensive-practice severity, and the legal-literacy–anxiety association was stronger at lower experience (interaction p = 0.023). Conclusions: Knowledge, anxiety, and defensive practice were unevenly distributed; defensive practice reflected professional context and direct or vicarious litigation exposure, while the legal-literacy–anxiety association varied with experience. Medico-legal education may therefore be best paired with structured consent procedures and experience-sensitive support; larger multi-center studies are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tănase et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: