Key result
Each 1 mL/m2 increase in left ventricular stroke volume index was independently associated with an 8.2% reduction in the odds of all-cause mortality or mitral valve surgery.
Why the study?
Racial differences impact left ventricular size and echocardiographic parameters in severe primary MR, prompting investigation into whether left ventricular stroke volume index can serve as a prognostic indicator.
Does left ventricular stroke volume index predict the composite of all-cause mortality or mitral valve surgery in patients with asymptomatic chronic severe primary mitral regurgitation?
Cohort (n=77)
No
Does left ventricular stroke volume index predict the composite of all-cause mortality or mitral valve surgery in patients with asymptomatic chronic severe primary mitral regurgitation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In asymptomatic patients with chronic severe primary mitral regurgitation, a lower left ventricular stroke volume index (≤ 35 mL/m2) is independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality or mitral valve surgery.
Background Severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR) linked to substantial morbidity and mortality. However, racial differences impact the left ventricular size, which subsequently influence specific echocardiographic parameters. In this context, the left ventricular stroke volume index (LVSVi) may serve as a valuable prognostic indicator. This study aims to examine the association between LVSVi and a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or mitral valve (MV) surgery. Methods We conducted a retrospective study on asymptomatic chronic severe primary MR patients over a 5-year follow-up period. Results Among 77 patients with asymptomatic severe primary MR (mean age, 56.9 years; 55 male patients, 71.4%), an increase of 1 mL/m 2 in LVSVi, calculated from the left ventricular outflow tract area, was independently associated with an 8.2% reduction in the odds of reaching the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or MV surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.918; 95% confidence interval, 0.856–0.986; P = 0.018). The receiver operating characteristic curve for LVSVi demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.726 ( P = 0.002), with a threshold of ≤ 35 mL/m 2 yielding a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 50% for predicting the composite outcome. The 5-year event-free survival was significantly lower in patients with LVSVi ≤ 35 mL/m 2 compared to those with LVSVi > 35 mL/m 2 (22.9% vs. 67.0%; Breslow test, P < 0.001). Conclusions In patients with asymptomatic chronic severe primary MR, LVSVi was the significant echocardiographic parameter influencing the outcomes of MV surgery and mortality. This study supported the hypothesis generation that LVSVi may serve as a prognostic marker in this specific population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sethalao et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic chronic severe primary mitral regurgitation (n=77). Left ventricular stroke volume index vs. Lower left ventricular stroke volume index was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality and mitral valve surgery (OR 0.918, 95% CI 0.856-0.986, p=0.018). Each 1 mL/m2 increase in left ventricular stroke volume index was independently associated with an 8.2% reduction in the odds of all-cause mortality or mitral valve surgery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: