Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis demonstrates that braneworld gravity raises the maximum white dwarf mass to only 1.50 solar masses, suggesting it cannot explain super-Chandrasekhar supernova progenitors.
We investigate the equilibrium structure of white dwarf stars in the Randall–Sundrum II braneworld scenario using the effective brane-TOV formulation, with the stellar matter described by the zero-temperature Chandrasekhar electron-degenerate equation of state at mean molecular weight per electron μ ₑ = 2 μ e = 2 . Scanning a range of brane tensions and Weyl-fluid closure parameters, we ask whether the braneworld corrections can support the super-Chandrasekhar masses ( ~ 2\,M_ ∼ 2 M ⊙ ) inferred for some over-luminous Type Ia supernova progenitors. To distinguish brane effects within the perturbative regime from formal extrapolations of the effective four-dimensional equations, we introduce a local, mass-based perturbativity diagnostic that compares the solution including the full Weyl evolution with the quadratic-correction-only solution at the same brane tension and central density. We do not compare against an independent non-perturbative five-dimensional solution – none currently exists in the literature for this configuration – but instead assess the perturbative admissibility of the solutions obtained after adopting the CAM closure. The general-relativistic limit is recovered with a Chandrasekhar mass of 1.425\,M_ 1.425 M ⊙ , and within the perturbative-validity regime the maximum white dwarf mass is 1.50\,M_ ≃ 1.50 M ⊙ – about $$5%$$ 5 % above this value and well below 2\,M_ 2 M ⊙ . Masses approaching 2\,M_ 2 M ⊙ arise only where the Weyl contribution is no longer perturbative. We conclude that, within the CAM-closed effective brane formulation and subject to the perturbative-validity criterion adopted here, RS-II braneworld corrections can mildly raise the Chandrasekhar mass scale but do not robustly support physical super-Chandrasekhar white dwarfs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. Zeyauddin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: