Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial finds no clear visual or physical gains from adding vision training to strength exercise in older adults, indicating the need for larger trials.
Falls among older adults are a major public health concern; however, scientific evidence for interventions that specifically target visual function remains limited. Therefore, this exploratory pilot randomized trial evaluated changes in multiple visual-function outcomes associated with an oculomotor-focused vision training (VT) program in community-dwelling older adults. Thirty community-dwelling older adults (mean age, 73.7 ± 4.8 years) were randomly assigned to a lower-limb strength training group (SLR) or a group with SLR and an additional VT component (SLR + VT). Over 8 weeks, six visual-function components were assessed using the V-training system (eye–hand coordination, visual memory, spatial cognition, peripheral perception, central/peripheral perception, and eye movement). Physical function was assessed using the Timed Up and Go test. For each outcome, ANCOVA was performed with the post-intervention value as the dependent variable, group as the fixed factor, and the corresponding baseline value as a covariate. Baseline-adjusted analyses showed no clear between-group differences in post-intervention visual-function or physical-function outcomes. Several point estimates favored the VT group for outcomes aligned with repeated eye-movement practice, but confidence intervals were wide. In this pilot trial, clear baseline-adjusted differences between the two SLR-based programs, with or without an additional VT component, were not confirmed. Given the small sample size, findings are hypothesis-generating and will inform the design of adequately powered trials with time- and attention-matched control conditions and clinically meaningful endpoints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sudo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: