Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate clinical characteristics, vessel involvement (SVD, DVD, TVD), and risk factors for TVD in symptomatic ACS patients.
Observational (n=111)
No
In this Indian cohort of ACS patients, single-vessel disease was the most common angiographic finding, and traditional risk factors were not independently associated with triple-vessel disease.
OBJECTIVES: To study the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients with symptomatic acute coronary syndrome (ACS). To determine the outcomes in terms of single-vessel disease (SVD), double-vessel disease (DVD), and triple-vessel disease (TVD) among the patients. To determine the risk factors of TVD. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted on 111 patients with ACS. Demographic and clinical profiles of the patients were noted. Patients with unstable angina (UA) and asymptomatic patients were excluded from the study. Outcomes were noted in terms of the involvement of the number of coronary vessels and the risk factors of TVD. RESULTS: -value of 0.049. Univariate logistic regression showed that none of the factors among age, gender, comorbidities, and family history were significant independent risk factors for TVD. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that ACS patients are predominantly elderly males with comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, a family history of heart disease, and dyslipidemia. The LAD was the most commonly involved coronary artery in ACS. The occurrence of SVD surpassed DVD and TVD among ACS patients. None of the risk factors was significantly associated with TVD independently.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chowdhary et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=111). Age, gender, comorbidities, and family history was evaluated on Incidence of single-vessel, double-vessel, and triple-vessel disease and risk factors for triple-vessel disease (TVD).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: