Key result
Measuring the breath holding index from the submandibular window in the internal carotid artery showed a significant positive correlation with the traditional middle cerebral artery measurement.
Why the study?
A notable drawback of transcranial Doppler is the absence of a transtemporal acoustic bone window, prompting evaluation of the submandibular window as an alternative for measuring breath holding index.
Does measurement of breath holding index from the submandibular window correlate with transtemporal measurement for assessing cerebrovascular reactivity in healthy adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=25)
No
Does measurement of breath holding index from the submandibular window correlate with transtemporal measurement for assessing cerebrovascular reactivity in healthy adults?
Measuring the breath holding index from the submandibular window provides a reliable alternative for assessing cerebrovascular reactivity when the temporal bone window is insufficient.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May provide an alternative for assessing cerebrovascular reactivity when temporal windows are inadequate;.
Background and Purpose: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is a noninvasive and effective technique for the measurement of cerebrovascular function. Measurement of breath holding index (BHI) in the middle cerebral artery is commonly performed to determine cerebrovascular reactivity. Nevertheless, a notable drawback of TCD is the absence of a transtemporal acoustic bone window. The submandibular window offers an alternative way to measure BHI. Here, we studied the diagnostic accuracy of cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in the internal carotid artery (ICA) as measured from the submandibular window. Methods: Twenty-five volunteers (13 male, 12 female) with sufficient temporal acoustic bone windows were assessed. BHI was measured by mean blood velocities before and after breath holding. The correlation of BHI measured in ICA (BHIi) and ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (BHIm) was assessed. Results: The mean age of the participants was 39.9 ± 13.7 years. The mean BHIm and BHIi values were 0.93 ± 0.29 and 0.92 ± 0.32, respectively. Spearman’s correlation coefficient between BHIm and BHIi was 0.665 (p = 0.0003). The cutoff point of the BHIi value for CVR impairment determined by BHIm was 0.71 (sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 80.0%). Conclusion: Measuring BHI from the submandibular window may be a useful procedure in the case of temporal bone window insufficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okada et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy volunteers (n=25). Submandibular window approach for measuring breath holding index (BHIi) vs. Transtemporal window approach for measuring BHI (BHIm) was evaluated on Correlation of BHI measured in the internal carotid artery (BHIi) and ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (BHIm) (rs = 0.665, p=0.0003). Measuring the breath holding index from the submandibular window in the internal carotid artery showed a significant positive correlation with the traditional middle cerebral artery measurement.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: