Why the study?
Do deep sedation regimens with spontaneous ventilation increase hypercarbia and oxygen desaturation compared to controlled ventilation in children undergoing cardiac catheterization?
Do deep sedation regimens with spontaneous ventilation increase hypercarbia and oxygen desaturation compared to controlled ventilation in children undergoing cardiac catheterization?
Deep sedation with spontaneous ventilation during pediatric cardiac catheterization leads to significant hypercarbia and desaturation compared to controlled ventilation, highlighting potential risks for patients with pulmonary hypertension.
May support controlled ventilation to limit respiratory risks in pediatric cardiac catheterization; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
The purpose of this observational study was to determine whether hypercarbia or oxygen desaturation occurred during our current regimens of deep sedation or general anaesthesia of infants and children undergoing cardiac catheterization. Data were gathered prospectively from 50 consecutive infants and children aged 4 months to 12 years undergoing cardiac catheterization. Several anaesthetists used the following regimens, which were not randomized: 1) propofol. 1.5-2.0 mg.kg-1 and fentanyl 1 microgram.kg-1 IV over 2 min for induction, followed by propofol infusion of 100-150 micrograms.kg-1.min-1; 2) fentanyl 2-3 micrograms.kg-1 and midazolam 0.1-0.2 mg.kg-1 IV over 10-15 min; 3) ketamine 8 mg.kg-1 IM, or 4) same as regimens 1 or 2, plus pancuronium, intubation and controlled ventilation. Regimens 1, 2, and 3 were associated with spontaneous ventilation through the natural airway. End-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PetCO2), SpO2, and respiratory rate were monitored for 60 min. The three regimens employing spontaneous ventilation through the natural airway were associated with both statistically and clinically significant increases in PetCO2 and decreases in SpO2. This raises the possibility that acute exacerbation of PAP and PVR may occur in pulmonary hypertensive patients. In contrast, PetCO2 and SpO2 did not change significantly from baseline in the controlled ventilation group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Friesen et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: