Why the study?
Does the measurement of CK-MB isoforms distinguish acute myocardial infarction from skeletal muscle injury?
Does the measurement of CK-MB isoforms distinguish acute myocardial infarction from skeletal muscle injury?
The CK-MB isoform ratio is increased in both acute skeletal muscle injury and MI, making it most useful for distinguishing recent from old injury rather than differentiating cardiac from skeletal muscle sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
CK-MB isoform ratio lacks specificity for acute MI versus skeletal trauma; leaves open utility for distinguishing recent from remote injury pending prospective studies.
Wu et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: