Clinical experience with 3-tesla MRI for body applications has only a short history; to date, it has no proven practical advantage over 1.5-tesla or less powerful systems. However, the theoretical advantage of higher field strength-which includes a higher signal-to-noise ratio with identical scan parameters, higher special resolution available within clinically acceptable scan time, and better spectral resolution-can contribute to the clinical outcome. This paper seeks to demonstrate some of the clinical advantages of the 3-tesla system through preliminary experiences as well as the potential advantages of a 3-tesla system when combined with much of the hardware and software that is clinically accepted in the 1.5-tesla world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiroshi Fukatsu (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: