Experimental study demonstrates machine learning accurately predicts passive heat recovery ventilation performance, indicating optimal airflow settings reduce energy use and carbon emissions.
Heat Recovery Ventilation (HRV) systems reduce building energy demand by thermally coupling exhaust and fresh outdoor air streams through a plate heat exchanger core, without auxiliary heating. This study presents a machine-learning (ML) framework for predicting and optimizing the passive performance of the Argemsan K-203 cross-flow plate heat exchanger under variable airflow conditions. Outdoor fresh air at 7.8oC/81%RH was drawn through the HRV core and supplied to the occupied space, while indoor exhaust air at 21.1oC /55%RH was simultaneously discharged outside through the same core-the built-in 1500W electrical heater was intentionally deactivated throughout. Experiments were conducted over 60 minutes at 13 measurement states spanning u_t∈{2, 4, 6} m/s and u_e∈{2, 4, 6, 7.2} m/s. Three regression models - Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Ridge Regression-were evaluated via Leave-One-Out Cross Validation (LOO-CV). RF achieved R2 =0.931, MAE=0.261oC for fresh-air outlet temperature (T4); Gradient Boosting achieved R2=0.880 for sensible efficiency (ηT). Sensible efficiency ranged from 48.2% to 78.8% (mean 58.9%) and a humidity-ratio–based latent effectiveness of 35-59% (mean 44%). Recovered heat power spanned 245-713W, yielding 236-685 kWh/year of annual energy savings and 48-138 (natural gas) or 100-290 (grid) kgCO2/year avoidance per unit. Response-surface analysis identifies u_t=2 m/s with u_e ≥6 m/s as the optimal operating band.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hakan Tutumlu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: