Historical-sociological analysis reveals elite reconfiguration preserves authoritarian rule during political crises in Algeria, highlighting mechanisms that prevent democratic transition.
This article explains the endurance of Algerian authoritarianism through a historical-sociological analysis of elite reconfiguration in moments of crisis. Rather than privileging the military or opposition weakness, it argues that crises create openings for regime insiders outside the decision-making core to rise by adopting reformist and democratizing language while preserving the regime’s authoritarian pillars. Tracing the legacy of Boumediene’s 1965 coup across the Bendjedid, Bouteflika, and post-Hirak periods, the article shows how elite circulation, selective displacement, and institutional conversion repeatedly reproduced authoritarian rule instead of enabling democratic rupture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berkan Özgür (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: