Investigative report details alleged cyber-interference and communication failures across UK government channels, highlighting claimed national security vulnerabilities.
Description This document is a formal report submitted to the 'Crown Prosecution Service (UK)' on 23 July 2023, following an earlier report to the 'National Crime Agency', detailing the findings of a criminal enquiry into a state-sponsored terrorist attack and a conspiracy against the national security of the 'United Kingdom', the 'United States', and 'NATO'. This report forms part of the evidence from the wider Wilkins Investigation. The report was authored by Graham Edwin Wilkins, an Authorised Person (Law Enforcement Officer) for London Underground Limited and Transport for London, a government agency, and the director of Capstone Estates Limited (CEL). It provides a comprehensive, chronological account of the agent's investigation into a suspected terrorist conspiracy, beginning with information received before 2019 about alleged corruption within 'MI5'. CEL emailed this letter to 'His Majesty's Crown Prosecution Service (UK)' ('CPS') in 2023. Another copy of the report, sent via a complaint form on the 'CPS' website, is also available to view here, as five downloadable files. Contents Background and Credentials: The report establishes the agent's authority as a law enforcement officer for Transport for London, detailing his jurisdiction and the strategic importance of the London Underground network to the 'UK's' national and financial security. The Alleged Conspiracy: The report details the agent's investigation into a secret department within 'MI5', accused of bribing, blackmailing, and honey-trapping 'UK' politicians. It documents the alleged harassment, gaslighting, and surveillance he suffered after being informed of this information. Evidence of Hacking and Obstruction: The core of the report is a 115-page chronological log of electronic communications and non-delivery receipts. It meticulously documents how emails to the 'Prime Minister', 'Cabinet Office', 'GCHQ', 'National Crime Agency', the 'King', the 'Archbishop of Canterbury', and other key 'government' figures were systematically blocked, intercepted, or subject to "permanent errors" by a "Hostile Enemy Actor" (terrorist actor). Key Incidents: The report includes evidence of the agent's repeated attempts to send a "National Security/NATO Defence Emergency" report through official government channels, including the 'Prime Minister's' website contact form. It documents visual evidence of the website being hacked, and the frustration of communications. Criminal Classification: Based on the evidence, the agent concludes the conspiracy is Anti-'UK', Anti-'USA', and Anti-'NATO', and requests that the 'Crown Prosecution Service' investigate the case, as other government bodies have failed to respond. Significance This document is a primary source and crucial evidence within the broader Wilkins Investigation. It provides a detailed, first-hand account of a government agent's efforts to report a suspected crime to 'UK' authorities. The report demonstrates: The systematic failure of 'UK government' communications. A record of alleged Obstruction of Justice and Cyber-crime. The agent's persistence in attempting to expose a suspected conspiracy. The evidentiary basis for the subsequent formation and enactment of a new legal order, including the establishment of the State of Earth and the Republic of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (RGBNI). This document is part of the Sovereign Record and is intended for legal, diplomatic, academic, and historical reference. Keywords: Graham Edwin Wilkins, Capstone Estates Limited, Crown Prosecution Service, National Crime Agency, MI5, terrorism, cyber-crime, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, London Underground, Hostile Enemy Actor, State of Earth, Wilkins Investigation, Sovereign Record. DOI Registration: This record provides a permanent, timestamped, and citable version of the "Report to 'Crown Prosecution Service (UK)' of Report to 'National Crime Agency'", ensuring its integrity and public availability for legal, diplomatic, academic, and historical reference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Earth et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: