Why the study?
Does renal failure alter the pharmacokinetics and disposition of encainide and its active metabolites compared to healthy subjects?
Does renal failure alter the pharmacokinetics and disposition of encainide and its active metabolites compared to healthy subjects?
Patients with renal failure require lower doses of encainide due to reduced clearance and increased accumulation of its active metabolites.
Renal failure may increase encainide metabolite exposure; hypothesis-generating for dose adjustments but should not yet change practice.
The antiarrhythmic agent encainide undergoes extensive presystemic biotransformation to form O-desmethylencainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-ODE (MODE) in subjects who exhibit the extensive metabolizer (EM) phenotype for debrisoquin 4-hydroxylation. These metabolites contribute significantly to the overall antiarrhythmic activity and are extensively excreted in the urine. Therefore, the effects of renal impairment on the disposition of encainide and its metabolites were studied in seven EM patients with renal failure and compared with those in eight healthy normal subjects of the same phenotype. After a single dose of encainide, its systemic and oral clearances were significantly lower and its elimination t1/2 was shorter in patients with renal failure than in healthy volunteers. This shortening was explained by a significant reduction in steady-state volume of distribution in renal failure. After chronic dosing to steady state, quantitatively similar changes were seen. Chronic oral dosing produced 80% higher levels of ODE (the most pharmacodynamically active metabolite) and 167% higher levels of MODE as compared with healthy volunteers. The prolongations in ECG intervals were similar in the two groups despite the higher encainide dose in the normal subjects. In conclusion, patients with renal failure will require lower doses of encainide because of both reduced encainide clearance and increased accumulation of active metabolites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergstrand et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: