Why the study?
Does glibenclamide improve postischaemic cardiac function via KATP channel blockade in isolated rat hearts?
Does glibenclamide improve postischaemic cardiac function via KATP channel blockade in isolated rat hearts?
Glibenclamide improves postischaemic cardiac function in isolated rat hearts, but this protective effect appears independent of KATP channel blockade, as KATP openers also provided similar protection.
Challenges presumed KATP-dependent cardioprotection by glibenclamide in ischemia; hypothesis-generating for alternative mechanisms in animal models.
Glibenclamide preserves postischaemic myocardial function in the isolated, erythrocyte perfused, working rat heart model. This study addresses the possible involvement of KATP channels in this beneficial action of glibenclamide. We hypothesized that if glibenclamide improved postischaemic cardiac function by blocking of KATP channels, opening of these KATP channels should result in the opposite, namely detrimental effects on postischaemic heart function. Postischaemic functional loss and coronary blood flow were recorded during treatment with glibenclamide (4 micromol x l(-1); n = 5), the KATP channel openers pinacidil (1 micromol x (l-1); n = 5) and diazoxide (30 micromol x l(-1); n = 5), the combination of glibenclamide with pinacidil (n = 5) and glibenclamide with diazoxide (n = 5), and vehicle (n = 8). Both pinacidil and diazoxide significantly increased coronary blood flow 2-3 times, which was abolished by glibenclamide pre- and postischaemically. This confirms that under both flow conditions glibenclamide significantly blocks KATP channels in the coronary vasculature. The 12 min. global ischaemic incident resulted in a cardiac functional loss of 22.2 +/- 2.9% during vehicle. Glibenclamide reduced the cardiac functional loss to 4.3 +/- 1.2% (P < 0.01). Interestingly, both pinacidil and diazoxide reduced the cardiac functional loss to 4.0 +/- 1.5% (P < 0.01) and 2.9 +/- 1.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. The combination pinacidil+glibenclamide resulted in additional protection compared with the individual components (0.6 +/- 0.1 versus 4.0 +/- 1.5%, P < 0.05). Thus, in contrast to its effect on coronary vascular tone, the glibenclamide-induced improvement of postischaemic cardiac function may not be mediated through blockade of the KATP channel. Alternative mechanisms may be operative, such as uncoupling of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, thereby preconditioning the hearts against stunning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Legtenberg et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: