Key result
Sevoflurane and propofol resulted in similar reductions in global longitudinal strain after cardiopulmonary bypass, though sevoflurane better preserved regional peak systolic longitudinal strain.
Why the study?
It was hypothesized that sevoflurane, via anesthetic preconditioning, preserves myocardial function better than propofol during on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Does sevoflurane preserve global longitudinal strain better than propofol in patients undergoing on-pump CABG?
Observational (n=50)
Single-blind (investigators blinded to offline strain analysis)
None (consecutive assignment)
No
Does sevoflurane preserve global longitudinal strain better than propofol in patients undergoing on-pump CABG?
Absolute Event Rate: -11.69% vs -11.93%
p-value: p=0.4874
Sevoflurane and propofol result in similar reductions in global left ventricular longitudinal strain after on-pump CABG, though sevoflurane may better preserve regional mid-segment strain.
Should not alter anesthetic selection; leaves open the clinical relevance of regional strain differences.
Background: Assessment of myocardial deformation by quantifying peak systolic longitudinal strain (PSLS) is a sensitive and robust index to detect subclinical myocardial dysfunction. We hypothesize that sevoflurane by virtue of anesthetic preconditioning preserves myocardial function better than propofol. Aims: The authors have assessed the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on global longitudinal strain (GLS) as a primary outcome in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Our secondary aim was to assess the pattern of regional distribution of segmental PSLS between the groups. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with normal left ventricular function undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were analyzed in this prospective observational study. Consecutive patients received either propofol (P) or sevoflurane (S) anesthesia. Measurements: Trans-esophageal echocardiographic images (mid-esophageal four-chamber, two-chamber, and three-chamber (long-axis)) were recorded during the precardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and post-CPB period. Strain analysis (GLS/segmental PSLS) was done offline by investigators blinded to the study. The inotropic score, duration of inotropic support, and mechanical ventilation required were recorded. Results: Following cardiopulmonary bypass and coronary revascularization, GLS reduced significantly in both the groups (P < 0.05). In the S-group, significant reduction in segmental strain was observed only in apical segments including apex, whereas in P-group significant reduction in segmental strain was seen in mid- and apical segments. The postoperative VIS, duration of inotropes/vasopressor required, and mechanical ventilation were similar in both the groups. Conclusions: There are no significant differences in global left ventricular function as assessed by GLS between patients anesthetized with sevoflurane or propofol. However, regional PSLS was better preserved in the S-group compared to P-group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chennakeshavallu et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Coronary Artery Disease undergoing CABG (n=50). Sevoflurane vs. Propofol (75-100 µg/kg/min) was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (GLS) post-cardiopulmonary bypass (p=0.4874). Sevoflurane and propofol resulted in similar reductions in global longitudinal strain after cardiopulmonary bypass, though sevoflurane better preserved regional peak systolic longitudinal strain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: