Key result
Pericardial VEGF levels were significantly higher in malignant pericardial effusion (13,593.8 pg/mL) compared with nonmalignant effusion (610.6 pg/mL; P=0.001).
Why the study?
Does measurement of pericardial vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels discriminate malignant from benign pericardial effusions?
Observational (n=75)
Does measurement of pericardial vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels discriminate malignant from benign pericardial effusions?
Pericardial VEGF levels are markedly elevated in malignant pericardial effusions and may serve as a useful diagnostic biomarker to differentiate them from benign effusions.
Pericardial VEGF may aid differentiation of malignant effusions; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: The pathogenetic role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in malignant pericardial effusion and diagnostic value of pericardial VEGF levels to discriminate malignant from benign pericardial effusions are uncertain. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that pericardial VEGF levels would be higher in malignant than benign pericardial effusion and that VEGF would be a useful marker for the diagnosis of malignant pericardial effusion. METHODS: Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, we assessed pericardial and serum VEGF levels in patients with malignant pericardial effusion (n = 19), in patients with nonmalignant pericardial effusion (n = 30), and for control, in patients without pericardial disease (n = 26). RESULTS: Vascular endothelial growth factor pericardial levels in malignant pericardial effusion (13 593.8 ± 22 410.24 pg/mL) were significantly higher compared with VEGF in nonmalignant effusion (610.63 ± 1289.08 pg/mL; P = 0.001) and pericardial fluid (5.5 ± 15.97 pg/mL; P < 0.001). In serum, VEGF was significantly higher in patients with nonmalignant pericardial effusion (188.3 ± 240.35 pg/mL) compared with patients with malignant pericardial effusion (67.52 ± 125.77 pg/mL; P = 0.024) and coronary artery disease patients (29.13 ± 76.26 pg/mL; P < 0.001). Pericardial VEGF levels were significantly higher than matched serum levels only in patients with malignant pericardial effusion (P = 0.023). Pericardial VEGF levels ≥2385 pg/mL had 75% sensitivity and 90% specificity for the recognition of malignant pericardial effusion in patients with breast or lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular endothelial growth factor levels in pericardial effusion are markedly elevated in patients with malignant pericardial effusion, indicating abundant local release within the pericardial cavity. It is thus possible that VEGF participates in the pathogenesis of malignant pericardial effusion. Measurement of VEGF in pericardial effusion offers potential as a diagnostic tool to discriminate malignant from benign effusions in patients with breast or lung cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karatolios et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Pericardial effusion (n=75). Malignant pericardial effusion vs. Nonmalignant pericardial effusion and controls was evaluated on Pericardial VEGF levels (pg/mL) (p=0.001). Pericardial VEGF levels were significantly higher in malignant pericardial effusion (13,593.8 pg/mL) compared with nonmalignant effusion (610.6 pg/mL; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: