Key result
Intrapericardial administration of carboplatin after catheter drainage achieved a 100% control rate of malignant pericardial effusion at 1 month in patients with breast cancer.
Why the study?
Breast cancer is frequently associated with malignant pericardial effusion, but the efficacy and safety of intrapericardial carboplatin had never been evaluated in breast cancer.
Does intrapericardial carboplatin improve malignant pericardial effusion control and survival in patients with breast cancer-related MPE?
Observational (n=8)
No
Does intrapericardial carboplatin improve malignant pericardial effusion control and survival in patients with breast cancer-related MPE?
Intrapericardial carboplatin administration after catheter drainage appears safe and highly effective for controlling breast cancer-associated malignant pericardial effusion, yielding a 100% control rate at 1 month.
May support intrapericardial carboplatin for malignant pericardial effusion in breast cancer; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
PURPOSE: Malignant pericarditis is observed in 5.1-7.0% of all cases of acute pericarditis, and malignant pericardial effusion (MPE) can lead to cardiac tamponade in the later stages of cancer. Breast cancer is the second most common primary cancer associated with MPE, but the efficacy and safety of intrapericardial carboplatin (CBDCA) have never been evaluated in breast cancer. In this study, we assessed the clinical significance of intrapericardial CBDCA following catheter drainage in patients with breast cancer-related MPE. METHODS: A catheter was inserted percutaneously into the pericardial space under echocardiographic guidance. After complete drainage, 150 mg of CBDCA was instilled into the pericardial space through the catheter. RESULTS: Eight patients with symptomatic breast cancer-related MPE were treated at the Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, between July 2010 and March 2016. One month after treatment, 100% of MPE was controlled. The median survival time from the recurrence of breast cancer until death or study follow-up was 2336 days (range 293-3937 days), while that from intrapericardial CBDCA administration until death or study follow-up was 552 days (range 35-1673 days). Grade 1 fever, nausea, hypotension, fatigue, and chest discomfort were observed in one patient (12.5%) after intrapericardial CBDCA administration. CONCLUSIONS: We found that intrapericardial administration of CBDCA after catheter drainage appears to be safe and effective in managing breast cancer-associated MPE. As the number of patients in this study was small, further studies are warranted to determine the safety and efficacy of intrapericardial CBDCA in the management of breast cancer-related MPE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kotake et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Breast cancer-related malignant pericardial effusion (n=8). Intrapericardial carboplatin was evaluated on MPE control rate at 1 month after treatment. Intrapericardial administration of carboplatin after catheter drainage achieved a 100% control rate of malignant pericardial effusion at 1 month in patients with breast cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: