Key result
Systematic evaluation by a clinical radiopharmacist detected contraindications to regadenoson in 26.4% of patients undergoing SPECT-MPI, leading to test cancellation in 2.9% of cases.
Why the study?
To evaluate the radiopharmacist's role in a multidisciplinary team focused on regadenoson contraindications to ensure safe use of vasodilator stress agents during SPECT-MPI.
Does systematic review by a radiopharmacist improve the detection of contraindications to regadenoson in patients undergoing SPECT-MPI?
Observational (n=1,905)
Does systematic review by a radiopharmacist improve the detection of contraindications to regadenoson in patients undergoing SPECT-MPI?
Systematic review by a radiopharmacist identifies clinical contraindications to regadenoson in approximately one-quarter of patients referred for SPECT-MPI, enhancing patient safety.
May support radiopharmacist pre-screening for regadenoson; leaves open effects on safety outcomes.
Aim To assess the radiopharmacist’s role in a multidisciplinary team focused on the contraindications of regadenoson in order to ensure the safe use of pharmacologic vasodilator stress agents in patients undergoing SPECT-MPI. Methods We ambispectively studied its safe use in 1905 patients (54.1% female, mean age: 66.6 ± 11.7 years, range: 20–95 years). Sex, age, medical history , medications, drug allergies , and contraindications for stress testing were registered together with recommendations for the nuclear physician in charge. Results Detected contraindications and corresponding recommendations were as follows: risk factors for QTc interval prolongation 7.5% – measurement of QTc interval previously to test and monitor ECG; prior stroke or TIA 4.2% – consider carotid stenosis assessment; salicylates/sulfonamides allergy 3.1% – use 99m Tc-sestamibi; epilepsy or risk factors for seizures 2.4% – use of adenosine or reconsider test indication; systemic corticosteroid therapy for severe COPD 1.3% – reassessment of patient’s condition; acute exacerbation of COPD 0.8% – defer test until acute episode is over; severe asthma 0.4% – do not perform test; methylxanthine ingestion 0.3% – avoid consumption previously; other 6.1% – evaluation of other contraindications. No contraindications were detected in 73.6% of patients. The test was canceled due to absolute contraindications in 2.9% of the requests. Conclusions Working in a systematic way, the radiopharmacist was able to detect a high number of issues related to regadenoson , with one out of four patients presenting some clinical contraindication. The recommendations given by the radiopharmacist were well accepted by the nuclear physicians who changed their approach contributing to increase the safety of patients referred for MPI .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salgado-García et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing SPECT-MPI (n=1,905). Clinical radiopharmacist evaluation was evaluated on Detected contraindications to regadenoson. Systematic evaluation by a clinical radiopharmacist detected contraindications to regadenoson in 26.4% of patients undergoing SPECT-MPI, leading to test cancellation in 2.9% of cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: