Key result
The relationship between duration of anesthesia and equality of Train-of-Four and Double Burst Stimulation was highly significant.
Why the study?
Does Double Burst Stimulation (DBS) compared to Train-of-Four (TOF) improve detection of depth of neuromuscular blockade and adequacy of recovery in patients belonging to ASA-PS I & II?
Population
140 patients belonging to ASA-PS I & II
Comparison
Double Burst Stimulation (DBS) vs Train-of-Four (TOF)
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
Anesthesia duration significantly affects TOF-DBS agreement; leaves open DBS utility for neuromuscular monitoring in ASA I-II patients.
Observational (n=140)
Does Double Burst Stimulation (DBS) compared to Train-of-Four (TOF) improve detection of depth of neuromuscular blockade and adequacy of recovery in patients belonging to ASA-PS I & II?
This study compares Double Burst Stimulation and Train-of-Four for monitoring neuromuscular blockade, though the abstract is truncated.
P.A. Nazar (2015) conducted an observational in Neuromuscular blockade (n=140). Double Burst Stimulation vs. Train-of-Four was evaluated on Duration of anaesthesia and TOF and DBS equal. The relationship between duration of anesthesia and equality of Train-of-Four and Double Burst Stimulation was highly significant.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: