Key result
Rocuronium bromide (0.9 mg/kg) provided greater hemodynamic stability than vecuronium bromide (0.1 mg/kg) during induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation.
Why the study?
The study aimed to assess and compare the hemodynamic effects of rocuronium bromide and vecuronium bromide during induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Does rocuronium bromide improve hemodynamic stability compared to vecuronium bromide during induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
RCT (n=50)
Does rocuronium bromide improve hemodynamic stability compared to vecuronium bromide during induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Rocuronium provides better hemodynamic stability than vecuronium during induction of anesthesia and intubation in cardiac surgery patients.
Rocuronium may offer greater hemodynamic stability during intubation; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background: Muscle relaxants are used to provide surgical relaxation and to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Vecuronium and rocuronium decrease the heart rate and should be preferred in patient with faster baseline heart rate. Aim: To assess and compare the hemodynamic effects of Rocuronium Bromide and Vecuronium Bromide during induction of anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery Material & Method: Fifty patients of either sex above the age of fourteen years of ASA physical status I, II or III scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were enrolled. The patients were divided into two equal groups of 25 each - Group "V" Vecuronium bromide (0.1 mg. /kg.) and Group "R" Rocuronium bromide (0.9 mg./kg). Hemodynamic parameters were specically recorded at various time intervals basal, after Thiopentone sodium, after relaxant during intubation and 2, 5 and 10 minutes post intubation period. Results:In Group V, the mean heart rate had a signicant rise 2-minute post intubation. Mean SAPcontinued to fall after diazepam administration but the fall became statistically signicant 5 & 10 minutes post intubation, similar to mean DAP pressure and MAP, but the fall became statistically signicant only at 5 & 10 minutes post intubation. While, in Group R the mean heart rate showed minimal change from the base line recording and the value remained statistically insignicant at all intervals. Mean SAP showed a sudden fall after Thiopentone administration (statistically signicant). The rest of the readings were insignicant statistically. Conclusion:Rocuronium was found to be more hemodynamically stable than Vecuronium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiwari et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in elective cardiac surgery (n=50). Rocuronium bromide vs. Vecuronium bromide (0.1 mg/kg) was evaluated on Hemodynamic effects during induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Rocuronium bromide (0.9 mg/kg) provided greater hemodynamic stability than vecuronium bromide (0.1 mg/kg) during induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: