Key result
Rocuronium resulted in a lower pulse rate (79.97 vs 92.33) and systolic blood pressure (130.27 vs 150.70) at intubation compared with vecuronium (p<0.05) in patients undergoing off-pump CABG.
Why the study?
Neuromuscular blocking drugs must ensure hemodynamic stability during cardiac surgery, but rocuronium and vecuronium had not been comparatively evaluated in elective ultrafast-track off-pump CABG.
Does rocuronium improve intubating conditions and hemodynamic stability compared to vecuronium in patients undergoing elective ultrafast-track off-pump CABG?
RCT (n=60)
1:1
Does rocuronium improve intubating conditions and hemodynamic stability compared to vecuronium in patients undergoing elective ultrafast-track off-pump CABG?
Absolute Event Rate: 79.97% vs 92.33%
p-value: p=<0.05
Rocuronium provides good intubating conditions with better hemodynamic stability (lower pulse rate and systolic blood pressure at intubation) compared to vecuronium in patients undergoing off-pump CABG.
Rocuronium may blunt intubation hemodynamics in off-pump CABG; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation before practice change.
Background Neuromuscular blocking drugs are necessary in cardiac surgery to facilitate smooth intubation and ventilation conditions, avoid patient movement, reduce oxygen consumption, and prevent shivering. Hemodynamic stability is very essential in cardiac surgery because the coronary reserve is below normal in such patients. Aims This study was conducted with the objective of comparing rocuronium, the “near-ideal” muscle relaxant with vecuronium, an already established neuromuscular blocking agent in patients undergoing elective ultrafast-track off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Settings and Design This prospective, randomized comparative study included 60 patients scheduled for elective off-pump CABG procedures under general anesthesia in the period between May 2015 and March 2016. Materials and Methods Patients were randomized in equal numbers to either the rocuronium group or the vecuronium group, and intubating conditions and various hemodynamic parameters were observed at different time points. Statistical Analysis Used Categorical variables were evaluated using the chi-square test, whereas the Student t-test or Mann–Whitney test were used for continuous variables. Results Pulse rate in the rocuronium group was lesser (79.97 ± 7.42) (p < 0.05) at the time of intubation as compared with the vecuronium group (92.33 ± 8.93). Systolic blood pressure was higher in the vecuronium group (150.70 ± 14.05) at the time of intubation as compared with the rocuronium group (130.27 ± 9.95) (p < 0.05). Intubating conditions, mean arterial pressure, and diastolic blood pressure changes were similar in both groups. Conclusions Rocuronium provides good-to-excellent intubating conditions and is devoid of any significant cardiovascular changes causing hemodynamic instability when compared with vecuronium in patients undergoing elective ultrafast-track off-pump CABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Elective ultrafast-track off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) (n=60). Rocuronium vs. Vecuronium was evaluated on Pulse rate at the time of intubation (p=<0.05). Rocuronium resulted in a lower pulse rate (79.97 vs 92.33) and systolic blood pressure (130.27 vs 150.70) at intubation compared with vecuronium (p<0.05) in patients undergoing off-pump CABG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: