Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The psychological distress and other end-of-life issues experienced by the terminally ill patient are a focus of attention for both the medical and psychiatric communities. The arena has engaged a variety of voices, from those who medicalize end-of-life distress to others who view distress as a normative response within the biopsychosocial-spiritual framework. This article reviews issues in assessment and treatment and suggests that medicalization of distress and DSM-IV-TR criteria are insufficient to describe the dying patient's experience. A broader view is needed. End-of-life care is a rich field of practice where existential concerns impact physical and mental well-being. It is imperative that clinicians in the field equip themselves with psychosocial and spiritual clinical tools. Social workers may have a unique position in understanding and addressing end-of-life issues. Recommendations for social work education include increased training to equip medical social workers to address the specific needs of chronically or terminally ill individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crunkilton et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: