Key result
Treatment of geriatric hip fractures by a comprehensive multidisciplinary team was associated with shorter time to surgery and length of stay.
Why the study?
Does comprehensive multidisciplinary team care improve time to surgery, length of stay, complications, and mortality in geriatric patients with hip fractures compared to unilateral orthopaedic team care?
Cohort (n=267)
Yes
Does comprehensive multidisciplinary team care improve time to surgery, length of stay, complications, and mortality in geriatric patients with hip fractures compared to unilateral orthopaedic team care?
Multidisciplinary care for geriatric hip fracture patients reduces time to surgery and length of hospital stay without significantly affecting complication or mortality rates.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports multidisciplinary hip fracture care; leaves open causality and need for randomized confirmation.
Background: Recent evidence has suggested that geriatric patients with osteoporotic hip fractures may benefit from comanagement with a multidisciplinary care team. We evaluated the effect that establishment of a comprehensive multidisciplinary care team had on time to surgery, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and morbidity on geriatric hip fracture patients. Methods: This study was a retrospective comparative cohort study of 267 patients admitted for geriatric hip fractures at an academic trauma center and a community hospital. Patients at the academic hospital were treated by a unilateral orthopaedic team, while patients at the community hospital were treated by a comprehensive multidisciplinary team (MDT), with both hospitals served by the same group of rotating physicians and ancillary staff. Outcomes included time to surgery (TTS), length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and mortality rates. Results: One hundred and twenty-nine hip fractures were treated by the MDT and 138 by the non-MDT. The MDT cohort was older (84.5 vs. 79.9 yr, P<0.001) and had a larger percentage of women (79.8% vs. 67.4%, P=0.03) than the non-MDT cohort. Patients in the MDT cohort experienced a shorter TTS (1.7 vs. 2.4 days, P<0.001) and LOS (8.2 vs. 10.7 days, P=0.024) than those in the non-MDT cohort. There were no differences in complication or mortality rates between the two cohorts. Conclusions: Treatment of patients with hip fractures by a comprehensive multidisciplinary team may lead to improved clinical processes shown by decreased time to surgery and shorter LOS but did not significantly decrease individual complication or mortality rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noticewala et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in geriatric hip fractures (n=267). Comprehensive multidisciplinary team (MDT) vs. Unilateral orthopaedic team (non-MDT) was evaluated on Time to surgery (TTS) in days (p=<0.001). Treatment of geriatric hip fractures by a comprehensive multidisciplinary team was associated with shorter time to surgery and length of stay.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: