Key result
Multiple time scales analysis of heart rate variability using a support vector machine classifier achieved an accuracy of 96.7% in identifying congestive heart failure.
Why the study?
Electrocardiogram heartbeats are substantial for cardiac disease diagnosis, but the best time scale to recognize congestive heart failure based on heart rate variability measures needed investigation.
Does multiple time scales analysis of heart rate variability improve the detection of congestive heart failure?
Observational (n=83)
Does multiple time scales analysis of heart rate variability improve the detection of congestive heart failure?
Multiple time scales analysis of HRV, particularly at the 2-hour scale with nonstandard features, provides high accuracy for detecting congestive heart failure.
It is well known that electrocardiogram heartbeats are substantial for cardiac disease diagnosis. In this paper, the best time scale was investigated to recognize congestive heart failure (CHF) based on heart rate variability (HRV) measures. The classifications were performed on seven different time scales with a support vector machine classifier. Nine HRV measures, including three time-domain measures, three frequency-domain measures, and three nonlinear-domain measures, were taken as feature vectors for classifier on each time scale. A total of 83 subjects with RR intervals were analyzed, of which 54 cases were normal and 29 patients were suffering from CHF in PhysioNet databases. The classifying results using tenfold cross-validation method achieved the best performance of a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 86.7%, 98.3%, and 94.4%, respectively, on the 2-h time scale. Moreover, by introducing only three nonstandard HRV features extracted from the trends of HRV measures on time scales, it achieved a better performance of a sensitivity of 93.3%, specificity of 98.3%, and an accuracy of 96.7%. The impressive performance of discrimination power on the 2-h time scale and the trends of HRV measures on time scales indicate that multiple time scales play significant roles in detecting CHF and can be valuable in expressing useful knowledge in medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Congestive Heart Failure (n=83). Multiple time scales analysis of heart rate variability vs. Normal sinus rhythm was evaluated on Classification accuracy for detecting congestive heart failure. Multiple time scales analysis of heart rate variability using a support vector machine classifier achieved an accuracy of 96.7% in identifying congestive heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: