Why the study?
Previous CHF pattern recognition models used excessive features leading to poor generalization and rarely distinguished severity levels of CHF.
Can machine learning models using a reduced number of features from long-term HRV signals accurately diagnose congestive heart failure and its severity levels?
Can machine learning models using a reduced number of features from long-term HRV signals accurately diagnose congestive heart failure and its severity levels?
Machine learning models using a small number of features from long-term HRV signals can accurately distinguish CHF patients from healthy individuals and classify CHF severity.
May support limited-feature HRV models for CHF severity staging; leaves open validation in larger prospective studies before clinical adoption.
Previous studies have attempted to find autonomic differences of the cardiac system between the congestive heart failure (CHF) disease and healthy groups using a variety of algorithms of pattern recognition. By comparing previous literature, we have found that there are two shortcomings: (1) Previous studies have focused on improving the accuracy of models, but the number of features used has mostly exceeded 10, leading to poor generalization performance; (2) Previous works rarely distinguish the severity levels of CHF disease. In order to make up for these two shortcomings, we proposed two models: model A was used for distinguishing CHF patients from the normal people; model B was used for diagnosing the four severity levels of CHF disease. Based on long-term heart rate variability (HRV) (40000 intervals–8h) signals, we extracted linear and non-linear features from the inter-beat-interval (IBI) series. After that, the sequence forward selection algorithm (SFS) reduced the feature dimension. Finally, models with the best performance were selected through the leave-one-subject-out validation. For a total of 113 samples of the dataset, we applied the support vector machine classifier and five HRV features for CHF discrimination and obtained an accuracy of 97.35%. For a total of 41 samples of the dataset, we applied k-nearest-neighbor (K = 1) classifier and four HRV features for diagnosing four severity levels of CHF disease and got an accuracy of 87.80%. The contribution in this work was to use the fewer features to optimize our models by the leave-one-subject-out validation. The relatively good generalization performance of our models indicated their value in clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hua et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: